胃癌组织中P4HB与GRP78表达的相关性及对患者预后的预测价值

张陈霏, 赵文静, 张邢松, 等. 胃癌组织中P4HB与GRP78表达的相关性及对患者预后的预测价值[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2022, 30(9): 643-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2022.09.06
引用本文: 张陈霏, 赵文静, 张邢松, 等. 胃癌组织中P4HB与GRP78表达的相关性及对患者预后的预测价值[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2022, 30(9): 643-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2022.09.06
ZHANG Chenfei, ZHAO Wenjing, ZHANG Xingsong, et al. Clinic correlation and prognostic value of P4HB and GRP78 expression in gastric cancer[J]. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med Dig, 2022, 30(9): 643-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2022.09.06
Citation: ZHANG Chenfei, ZHAO Wenjing, ZHANG Xingsong, et al. Clinic correlation and prognostic value of P4HB and GRP78 expression in gastric cancer[J]. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med Dig, 2022, 30(9): 643-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2022.09.06

胃癌组织中P4HB与GRP78表达的相关性及对患者预后的预测价值

  • 基金项目:
    南通市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(No:QA2019025)
详细信息

Clinic correlation and prognostic value of P4HB and GRP78 expression in gastric cancer

More Information
  • 目的 探讨脯氨酰4-羟化酶β多肽(P4HB)和葡萄糖调节蛋白78(GRP78)表达与胃癌临床特征的相关性及对患者预后的预测价值。方法 采用免疫组织化学法分别评估150例胃癌组织样本中P4HB和GRP78蛋白的表达,分析蛋白表达与胃癌临床病理学特征的关联。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较总生存期(OS)的生存曲线。用单变量和多变量Cox回归模型分析影响OS的潜在预后因素。基于多变量Cox回归模型构建预后列线图,并与TNM分期比较其临床价值。结果 P4HB的表达与患者年龄、Bormann分型、肿瘤浸润深度、淋巴结转移、术后辅助化疗相关,GRP78的表达与肿瘤浸润深度和淋巴结转移相关;两者的表达呈正相关。Kaplan-Meier分析表明,P4HB和GRP78的高单一表达或共表达预示较短的OS,两者的高共表达在术后辅助化疗组,特别是晚期组中预后不良。多因素Cox回归分析确定癌组织分化程度、TNM分期、术后辅助化疗、P4HB与GRP78共表达是OS的独立预后因素。在受试者工作特征曲线和决策曲线分析中,列线图在辨别能力和临床实用性方面优于TNM分期。结论 P4HB与GRP78的表达呈正相关,其共表达是OS的独立预后因素,可作为胃癌患者特别是晚期术后辅助化疗患者OS的预测生物标志物。预后列线图模型可能具有较高的临床应用价值。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  P4HB和GRP78在胃癌组织中表达的代表性免疫组织化学法染色图像(×400)

    图 2  胃癌患者OS的Kaplan-Meier分析

    图 3  胃癌患者OS预后列线图和校准曲线

    图 4  胃癌患者OS预后列线图与TNM分期的ROC和DCA曲线

    表 1  胃癌患者P4HB、GRP78表达与临床病理特征的关系 

    临床病理特征 P4HB表达 GRP78表达
    χ2 P χ2 P
    总体 74 76 71 79
    年龄/岁
         < 65 48 35 5.369 0.021 44 39 2.404 0.121
        ≥65 26 41 27 40
    性别
        男 49 54 0.408 0.523 49 54 0.008 0.931
        女 25 22 22 25
    Bormann分型
        Ⅰ~Ⅱ 32 20 4.743 0.029 25 27 0.018 0.894
        Ⅲ~Ⅳ 42 56 46 52
    肿瘤大小/cm
         < 5 43 40 0.455 0.500 41 42 0.318 0.573
        ≥5 31 36 30 37
    Lauren分型
        肠型 17 14 12 19
        弥漫型 40 31 5.489 0.064 38 33 2.263 0.323
        混合型 17 31 21 27
    分化程度
        高、中分化 31 29 0.218 0.641 29 31 0.040 0.841
        低分化 43 47 42 48
    病理类型
        腺癌 66 73 2.599 0.107 63 76 3.071 0.080
        黏液、印戒细胞癌 8 3 8 3
    肿瘤浸润深度
        T1~T3 61 43 11.786 0.001 55 49 4.192 0.041
        T4 13 33 16 30
    淋巴结转移
        阴性 32 19 5.561 0.018 30 21 4.092 0.043
        阳性 42 57 41 58
    TNM分期
        Ⅰ~Ⅱ 41 31 3.209 0.073 37 35 0.914 0.339
        Ⅲ~Ⅳ 33 45 34 44
    血管浸润
        阴性 53 53 0.064 0.800 48 58 0.609 0.435
        阳性 21 23 23 21
    周围神经浸润
        阴性 56 59 0.080 0.777 54 61 0.028 0.867
        阳性 18 17 17 18
    术后辅助化疗
        无 17 33 7.055 0.008 22 28 0.334 0.563
        有 57 43 59 51
    GRP78表达
        低 53 18 34.562 < 0.001
        高 21 58
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  胃癌患者OS预后特征的单因素和多因素Cox回归分析

    相关因素 单因素分析 多因素分析
    HR 95%CI P HR 95%CI P
    年龄/岁(≥65 vs. < 65) 1.246 0.791~1.963 0.343
    性别(女vs.男) 1.081 0.665~1.756 0.754
    Bormann分型(Ⅲ~Ⅳ vs.Ⅰ~Ⅱ) 2.142 1.271~3.609 0.004
    肿瘤大小/cm(≥5 vs. < 5) 1.662 1.056~2.616 0.028
    Lauren分型 0.214
        弥漫型vs.肠型 1.818 0.932~3.545 0.079
        混合型vs.肠型 1.613 0.790~3.293 0.190
    分化程度(低分化vs.高、中分化) 2.111 1.274~3.497 0.004 1.846 1.099~3.101 0.020
    病理类型[黏液(印戒)细胞癌vs.腺癌] 0.592 0.216~1.622 0.308
    肿瘤浸润深度(T4 vs.T1~T3) 2.536 1.601~4.019 < 0.001
    淋巴结转移(阳性vs.阴性) 3.824 2.060~7.101 < 0.001
    TNM分期(Ⅲ~Ⅳ vs.Ⅰ~Ⅱ) 3.200 1.942~5.275 < 0.001 3.124 1.870~5.217 < 0.001
    血管浸润(阳性vs.阴性) 1.385 0.861~2.229 0.180
    周围神经浸润(阳性vs.阴性) 1.279 0.766~2.135 0.346
    术后辅助化疗(有vs.无) 0.556 0.351~0.879 0.012 0.507 0.317~0.810 0.005
    P4HB表达(高vs.低) 2.266 1.414~3.630 0.001
    GRP78表达(高vs.低) 1.799 1.130~2.862 0.013
    P4HB和GRP78共表达(两者/一者高vs.两者低) 2.260 1.338~3.817 0.002 2.304 1.355~3.915 0.002
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

    [2]

    秦虹, 宋金霞, 底玮, 等. 胃癌组织中的DAB2IP、Snail表达及其与临床病理特征和预后的关系[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2021, 29(7): 411-415. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2021.06.06

    [3]

    Jiang Y, Zhang Q, Hu Y, et al. ImmunoScore Signature: A Prognostic and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(3): 504-513. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002116

    [4]

    Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 264-279. doi: 10.3322/caac.21657

    [5]

    Tameire F, Verginadis Ⅱ, Koumenis C, et al. Cell intrinsic and extrinsic activators of the unfolded protein response in cancer: Mechanisms and targets for therapy[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2015, 33: 3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.04.002

    [6]

    Kranz P, Neumann F, Wolf A, et al. PDI is an essential redox-sensitive activator of PERK during the unfolded protein response(UPR)[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2017, 8(8): e2986. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.369

    [7]

    Wang M, Kaufman RJ. The impact of the endoplasmic reticulum protein-folding environment on cancer development[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2014, 14(9): 581-597. doi: 10.1038/nrc3800

    [8]

    Zou H, Wen C, Peng Z, et al. P4HB and PDIA3 are associated with tumor progression and therapeutic outcome of diffuse gliomas[J]. Oncol Rep, 2018, 39(2): 501-510.

    [9]

    Shi R, Gao S, Zhang J, et al. Collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylases modify tumor progression[J]. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin(Shanghai), 2021, 53(7): 805-814.

    [10]

    Kong Y, Chen H, Chen M, et al. Abnormal ECA-Binding Membrane Glycans and Galactosylated CAT and P4HB in Lesion Tissues as Potential Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 855952. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.855952

    [11]

    Zhang J, Wu Y, Lin YH, et al. Prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and prolyl 4-hydroxylase beta polypeptide overexpression in gastric cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(22): 2381-2391. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2381

    [12]

    Kwon D, Koh J, Kim S, et al. Overexpression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins, XBP1 s and GRP78, predicts poor prognosis in pulmonary adenocarcinoma[J]. Lung Cancer, 2018, 122: 131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.06.005

    [13]

    Gifford JB, Hill R. GRP78 Influences Chemoresistance and Prognosis in Cancer[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2018, 19(6): 701-708. doi: 10.2174/1389450118666170615100918

    [14]

    Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, Sweep FC, et al. The unfolded protein response as a target for cancer therapy[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2014, 1846(2): 277-284.

    [15]

    Gonzalez-Gronow M, Pizzo SV. Physiological Roles of the Autoantibodies to the 78-Kilodalton Glucose-Regulated Protein(GRP78) in Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases[J]. Biomedicines, 2022, 10(6): 1222. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061222

    [16]

    Xia W, Zhuang J, Wang G, et al. P4HB promotes HCC tumorigenesis through downregulation of GRP78 and subsequent upregulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(5): 8512-8521. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14337

    [17]

    Li L, Cui Y, Ji JF, et al. Clinical Correlation Between WISP2 and beta-Catenin in Gastric Cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(8): 4469-4473.

    [18]

    Mohi-Ud-Din R, Mir RH, Wani TU, et al. The Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Cancer: Special Focuses on Luteolin Patents[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(8): 2471. doi: 10.3390/molecules27082471

    [19]

    Lee E, Lee DH. Emerging roles of protein disulfide isomerase in cancer[J]. BMB Rep, 2017, 50(8): 401-410. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.8.107

    [20]

    Gwark S, Ahn HS, Yeom J, et al. Plasma Proteome Signature to Predict the Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2021, 13(24): 6267.

    [21]

    Casas C. GRP78 at the Centre of the Stage in Cancer and Neuroprotection[J]. Front Neurosci, 2017, 11: 177.

    [22]

    Ibrahim IM, Abdelmalek DH, Elfiky AA. GRP78: A cell's response to stress[J]. Life Sci, 2019, 226: 156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.04.022

    [23]

    Dai YJ, Qiu YB, Jiang R, et al. Concomitant high expression of ERalpha36, GRP78 and GRP94 is associated with aggressive papillary thyroid cancer behavior[J]. Cell Oncol(Dordr), 2018, 41(3): 269-282. doi: 10.1007/s13402-017-0368-y

    [24]

    Liu M, Yang J, Lv W, et al. Down-regulating GRP78 reverses pirarubicin resistance of triple negative breast cancer by miR-495-3p mimics and involves the p-AKT/mTOR pathway[J]. Biosci Rep, 2022, 42(1): 20210245. doi: 10.1042/BSR20210245

    [25]

    Foth M, Mcmahon M. Autophagy Inhibition in BRAF-Driven Cancers[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2021, 13(14): 3498.

    [26]

    Mayer M, Kies U, Kammermeier R, et al. BiP and PDI cooperate in the oxidative folding of antibodies in vitro[J]. J Biol Chem, 2000, 275(38): 29421-29425. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002655200

    [27]

    Kim C, Kim B. Anti-Cancer Natural Products and Their Bioactive Compounds Inducing ER Stress-Mediated Apoptosis: A Review[J]. Nutrients, 2018, 10(8): 1021. doi: 10.3390/nu10081021

    [28]

    Wang Y, Wang K, Jin Y, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis control and gastric cancer[J]. Cancer Lett, 2019, 449: 263-271.

    [29]

    Khaled J, Kopsida M, Lennernas H, et al. Drug Resistance and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. Cells, 2022, 11(4): 632. doi: 10.3390/cells11040632

    [30]

    Shi Z, Yu X, Yuan M, et al. Activation of the PERK-ATF4 pathway promotes chemo-resistance in colon cancer cells[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 3210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39547-x

  • 加载中

(4)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  620
  • PDF下载数:  255
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-06-08
刊出日期:  2022-09-15

目录