Effects of Gegen Hongteng Jiedu Decoction on serum NLRP3 inflammasome, IL-18, IL-1β, intestinal flora and mucosal barrier in patients with turbidium-toxic ulcerative colitis
-
摘要: 目的 观察葛根红藤解毒汤对溃疡性结肠炎患者的血清核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域样受体蛋白3(nucleotide-binding oligomeric dome-like receptor protein 3,NLRP3)炎症小体、IL-1β、IL-18表达水平与对肠道菌群、黏膜屏障的影响。方法 将90例浊毒内蕴型溃疡性结肠炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各45例。对照组予美沙拉嗪肠溶片治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加葛根红藤解毒汤治疗,疗程均为8周。比较两组治疗前后的中医证候积分、血清NLRP3炎症小体、IL-1β、IL-18、二胺氧化酶(diamine oxidase, DAO)、D-乳酸的变化情况及肠道菌群数量。结果 治疗8周后,观察组的总有效率为91.11%(41/45),对照组为73.33%(33/45),观察组的疗效明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的中医证候积分均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),观察组的中医证候积分均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的血清NLRP3炎症小体、IL-1β、IL-18、DAO、D-乳酸水平均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),且观察组的血清NLRP3炎症小体、IL-1β、IL-18、DAO、D-乳酸水平明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗前后肠道菌群数量比较均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗期间两组患者的不良反应有腹部胀满、恶心、消化不良,对照组发生率为11.11%,观察组发生率为8.89%,两组间发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于浊毒内蕴型溃疡性结肠炎患者,单用美沙拉嗪肠溶片治疗效果欠佳,与葛根红藤解毒汤联合治疗效果显著,不仅能抑制血清炎症因子水平、缓解肠道炎症,还能保护肠黏膜屏障、调节患者肠道菌群,提高临床疗效。Abstract: Objective To observe the effects of Gegen Hongteng Jiedu Decoction on the expression levels of serum nucleotide-binding oligomeric dome-like receptor protein 3(NLRP3) inflammatome, interleukin-1β(IL-1β), interleukin-18(IL-18) and intestinal flora and mucosal barrier in patients with ulcerative colitis.Methods Ninety patients with ulcerative colitis were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, 45 cases in each group. The control group was treated with mesalazine enteric-coated tablets, and the observation group was treated with Gegen Hongteng Jiedu Decoction on the basis of the control group. The course of treatment was 8 weeks. Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) syndrome score, serum NLRP3 inflammasome, IL-1β, IL-18, diamine oxidase(DAO), D-lactic acid and intestinal flora were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results After 8 weeks of treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 91.11%(41/45) and that of the control group was 73.33%(33/45). The efficacy of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05). The scores of TCM symptoms in both groups were lower than before treatment(P < 0.05), and the scores of TCM symptoms in the observation group after treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group(P < 0.05). Serum levels of NLRP3 inflammasome, IL-1β, IL-18, DAO and D-lactic acid in 2 groups were lower than before treatment(P < 0.05), and serum levels of NLRP3 inflammasome, IL-1β, IL-18, DAO and D-lactic acid in observation group after treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group(P < 0.05). Before and after treatment, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of postintestinal flora(P < 0.05). During treatment, the adverse reactions of the two groups included abdominal distension, nausea and dyspepsia, the incidence of which was 11.11% in the control group and 8.89% in the observation group, with no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients with ulcerative colitis with turbidity toxin, mesalazine enteric-coated tablets alone have poor therapeutic effect, while the combined treatment with Gegen Hongteng Jiedu Decoction has significant therapeutic effect, which can not only inhibit serum inflammation level, relieve intestinal inflammation, but also protect intestinal mucosal barrier, regulate intestinal flora of patients, and improve clinical efficacy.
-
-
表 1 两组患者的临床疗效比较
例(%) 组别 例数 痊愈 显效 有效 无效 总有效 观察组 45 12(26.67) 19(42.22) 10(22.22) 4(8.89) 41(91.11)1) 对照组 45 6(13.33) 12(26.67) 15(33.33) 12(26.67) 33(73.33) 与对照组比较,1)P<0.05。 表 2 两组患者治疗前后中医证候积分的比较
分,X±S 组别 例数 便溏腹泻 脘腹疼痛 黏液脓血便 脘腹胀满 里急后重 口干口苦 肛门灼热 观察组 45 治疗前 5.35±2.37 4.75±2.25 4.65±2.53 1.92±0.68 1.79±0.93 1.72±0.84 1.65±0.90 治疗后 2.05±1.951)2) 1.93±1.721)2) 1.64±1.821)2) 0.83±0.751)2) 0.98±0.721)2) 0.69±0.731)2) 0.62±0.591)2) 对照组 45 治疗前 5.56±2.48 4.89±2.51 4.57±2.39 2.13±0.75 1.83±0.86 1.63±0.89 1.60±0.98 治疗后 3.95±2.591) 2.75±1.921) 3.28±2.251) 1.94±0.821) 1.45±0.741) 1.32±0.831) 0.94±0.871) 与本组治疗前比较,1)P<0.05;与对照组比较,2)P<0.05。 表 3 两组患者治疗前后血清NLRP3炎症小体、IL-1β、IL-18水平的比较
pg/mL,X±S 组别 例数 NLRP3炎症小体 IL-1β IL-18 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 45 696.20±72.24 395.70±28.671)2) 72.93±5.30 32.06±8.311)2) 89.64±9.39 38.31±14.431)2) 对照组 45 687.90±57.61 476.30±62.371) 70.33±4.05 40.75±5.951) 92.13±12.31 56.96±8.281) 与本组治疗前比较,1)P<0.05;与对照组比较,2)P<0.05。 表 4 两组患者治疗前后肠道菌群数量的比较
IgCFU/g,X±S 组别 例数 肠球菌 肠杆菌 乳酸杆菌 双歧杆菌 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 45 8.75±0.83 5.38±0.731)2) 9.85±0.93 8.01±0.651)2) 5.95±0.91 9.57±0.851)2) 5.37±0.71 9.73±0.671)2) 对照组 45 9.14±0.79 7.32±0.741) 10.14±0.98 9.75±0.891) 5.67±0.79 7.32±0.741) 5.25±0.82 7.01±0.761) 与本组治疗前比较,1)P<0.05;与对照组比较,2)P<0.05。 表 5 两组患者治疗前后肠屏障功能的比较
X±S 组别 例数 DAO/(ng/L) D-LA/(mg/L) 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 45 18.21±2.87 8.45±1.561)2) 14.78±3.22 6.29±1.471)2) 对照组 45 17.91±3.23 11.39±1.841) 15.09±3.78 10.23±2.991) 与本组治疗前比较,1)P<0.05;与对照组比较,2)P<0.05。 表 6 两组患者治疗期间的不良反应情况
例(%) 组别 例数 腹部胀满 恶心 呕吐 消化不良 总发生 观察组 45 2(4.44) 1(2.22) 0 1(2.22) 4(8.89) 对照组 45 3(6.66) 2(4.44) 0 0 5(11.11) -
[1] 中国中西医结合学会. 溃疡性结肠炎中西医结合诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2023, 43(1): 5-11.
[2] Zhang Y, Tan LX, Li C, et al. Sulforaphane alter the microbiota and mitigate colitis severity on mice ulcerative colitis induced by DSS[J]. AMB Expr, 2020, 10: 119. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01053-z
[3] 吴开春, 梁洁, 冉志华, 等. 炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2018年·北京)[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2018, 38(9): 796-813.
[4] 张声生, 沈洪, 郑凯, 等. 溃疡性结肠炎中医诊疗专家共识意见(2017)[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2017, 32(8): 3585-3589.
[5] 高燕, 王石红, 霍如晨, 等. 葛根红藤解毒汤联合美沙拉嗪肠溶片治疗溃疡性结肠炎浊毒内蕴证的疗效及对炎症因子的影响[J]. 河北中医, 2022, 44(6): 908-912.
[6] Ordas I, Eckmann L, Talamini M, et al. Ulcerative colitis[J]. Lancet, 2012, 380(9853): 1606-1619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60150-0
[7] Sandor Z, Deng XM, Khomenko T, et al. Altered angiogenic balance in ulcerative colitis: a key to impaired healing?[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006, 350(1): 147-150. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.09.021
[8] Cao SY, Ye SJ, Wang WW, et al. Progress in active compounds effective on ulcerative colitis from Chinese medicines[J]. Chin J Nat Med, 2019, 17(2): 81-102.
[9] 龚建萍, 李倩, 赵述芳, 等. 免疫因素在溃疡性结肠炎发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2020, 25(12): 1672-1675.
[10] Edward V. Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences[J]. Gastroenterology, 2004, 126(6): 1504-1517.
[11] 马琳, 王彧, 刘陶, 等. 中医药治疗溃疡性结肠炎的肠道菌群调节机制研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2022, 17(24): 3554-3558.
[12] 王诗恒, 秦培洁, 刘剑锋, 等. 葛根芩连汤治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床试验类文献的概述[J]. 世界中医药, 2022, 17(6): 807-813.
[13] 王庆泽, 李雪可, 刘建平, 等. 国医大师李佃贵基于浊毒学说分期辨治溃疡性结肠炎[J]. 吉林中医药, 2021, 41(2): 179-182.
[14] Jeon YD, Lee JH, Lee YM, et al. Puerarin inhibits inflammation and oxidative stress in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis mice model[J]. Biomedecine Pharmacother, 2020, 124: 109847.
[15] 焦瑶, 袁亚利, 王乾皓, 等. 基于网络药理学的黄芩-黄连治疗溃疡性结肠炎作用机制探讨[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2021, 19(7): 48-54.
[16] Hu YS, Zhou QL, Liu TL, et al. Coixol suppresses NF-κB, MAPK pathways and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 cells[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(4): 894.
[17] 聂承冬, 温静, 周婉梅, 等. 网络药理学探究败酱草治疗溃疡性结肠炎机制[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 37(4): 387-396.
[18] Wu SX, Chen ZL. Astragaloside alleviates the symptoms of experimental ulcerative colitis in vitro and in vivo[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(4): 2877-2884.
[19] Kelley N, Jeltema D, Duan YH, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome: an overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(13): 3328.
[20] 刘雨, 施丽婕, 杨洁, 等. 化瘀通阳方对溃疡性结肠炎大鼠血清IL-1β、IFN-γ表达的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2021, 30(19): 2063-2067.
[21] Esper L, Utsch L, Soriani FM, et al. Regulatory effects of IL-18 on cytokine profiles and development of myocarditis during Trypanosoma cruzi infection[J]. Microbes Infect, 2014, 16(6): 481-490.
[22] 余嘉文, 姚文娟, 朱和玲, 等. 肠道屏障功能对消化道肿瘤化学治疗后不良反应及营养状况的影响[J]. 海军军医大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 205-213.
[23] 牛敏, 邵天波, 陈瑞春, 等. 溃疡性结肠炎患者肠道菌群分析和细菌毒素基因检测[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2015, 50(4): 514-518.
-