Clinical effect observation of Sini Wendan Decoction treatment of liver-stomach disharmony in functional dyspepsia
-
摘要: 目的 观察四逆温胆汤加味治疗功能性消化不良(FD)的临床疗效。方法 收集我院中医内科、消化内科肝胃不和型FD患者共100例,随机分为治疗组、对照组,对照组予以消化酶片口服,治疗组予以四逆温胆汤加味治疗, 疗程1个月。分别观察2组治疗前后有效率、临床症状积分变化、证候疗效评定、生活质量评价等指标。结果 治疗组总有效率为90%,对照组为68%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。其中治疗组临床痊愈20%、显效46%,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。2组治疗前后各症状比较差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。其中治疗组餐后饱胀、上腹痛、上腹烧灼感与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。治疗组主要症状餐后饱胀、上腹痛、上腹烧灼感消失时间显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05),早饱消失时间略短于对照组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组治疗前后比较,生活质量评分差异均有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。结论 肝胃不和型FD运用四逆温胆汤加味治疗获得了较好临床效果,可有效缓解患者临床症状,缩短症状消失时间,是临床常用、安全、有效的治疗方案。Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical effect of Sini Wendan Decoctions treatment liver-stomach disharmony in FD.Methods A total of 100 patients with liver-stomach disharmony in FD in the Department of traditional Chinese medicine and the Department of Gastroenterology in our hospital were divided into treatment group and control group randomly. The control group was given digestive enzyme tablets orally, and the treatment group was treated with Sini Wendan Decoction. The course of treatment was 1 month. The effective rate, clinical symptom score change, the evaluation of syndrome efficacy and quality of life evaluation were observed before and after treatment.Results The total effective rate was 90% in the treatment group, but in the control group was 68% (P< 0.05). The treatment group clinical recovery was 20% and the remarkable effect was 46%, which was statistically significant compared with the control group (P< 0.05). The symptoms of the two groups before and after treatment were statistically significant (P< 0.05). The postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain and upper abdominal burning in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P< 0.05).The disappearance time of postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain and upper abdominal burning in the treatment group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P< 0.05), and the disappearance time of early fullness was slightly shorter than that in the control group (P> 0.05). The scores of quality of life between the two groups before and after treatment were significant different (P< 0.05).Conclusion The modified Sini Wendan Decoction has a good clinical efficacy in the treatment of functional dyspepsia of disharmony between liver and stomach. It can effectively alleviate the clinical symptoms and shorten the disappearance time of symptoms. It is a commonly used, safe and effective treatment plan in clinical practice.
-
表 1 2组患者一般资料比较
X±S 组别 例数 性别 平均年龄/岁 平均病程/年 男 女 治疗组 50 22 28 52.4±9.5 4.60±2.11 对照组 50 27 23 49.6±11.2 5.10±1.15 表 2 2组临床疗效比较
组别 例数 临床痊愈 显效 有效 无效 总有效率/% 治疗组 50 101) 231) 12 5 901) 对照组 50 6 11 17 16 68 与对照组比较,1)P < 0.05。 表 3 治疗前后症状积分比较
分,X±S 组别 疗程 餐后饱胀 早饱 上腹痛 上腹烧灼感 治疗组 治疗前 2.21±0.54 2.19±0.62 2.01±0.48 1.90±0.51 治疗后4周 0.91±0.181) 1.12±0.32 0.76±0.151) 0.64±0.291) t 31.14 20.18 32.86 29.56 P < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 对照组 治疗前 2.13±0.47 2.03±0.56 1.98±0.59 2.15±0.48 治疗后4周 1.61±0.42 1.34±0.56 1.16±0.28 1.19±0.32 t 13.77 8.19 11.70 17.25 P < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 与对照组比较,1)P < 0.05。 表 4 2组临床症状消失时间
d,X±S 组别 例数 餐后饱胀 早饱 上腹痛 上腹烧灼感 治疗组 50 5.31±1.24 4.41±1.13 5.92±1.68 6.79±1.56 对照组 50 7.48±0.93 5.12±1.46 7.42±1.10 9.37±1.35 t 16.25 3.49 10.28 11.63 P < 0.05 >0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 与对照组比较,1)P < 0.05。 表 5 2组生活质量评分
分,X±S 组别 时间 生理维度 社会心理维度 生活质量 治疗组 治疗前 66.73±12.14 52.33±12.38 57.58±12.87 治疗后 84.35±11.181)2) 72.57±10.621)2) 79.18±14.631)2) 对照组 治疗前 65.92±11.86 53.26±11.87 58.51±13.72 治疗后 74.11±12.131) 62.75±11.481) 65.54±12.181) 与同组治疗前比较,1)P < 0.05;与对照组比较,2)P < 0.05。 -
[1] 方秀才, 译. 罗马Ⅳ: 功能性胃肠病[M]. 2卷. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 969-1130.
[2] Alexander CF, Sanjiv M, Florencia C, et al. Functional dyspepsia[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10263): 1689-1702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30469-4
[3] Ohara S, Kawano T, Kusano M, et al. Survey on the prevalence of GERD and FD based on the Montreal definition and the Rome Ⅲ cri-teria among patients presenting with epigastric symptoms in Japan[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2011, 46(5): 603-611. doi: 10.1007/s00535-011-0382-1
[4] Ahmed M, Viola A, Paul E, et al. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia[J]. Deut Ärztebl Int, 2018, 115: 222-232.
[5] 中国中西医结合学会消化系统疾病专业委员会. 功能性消化不良中西医结合诊疗共识意见(2017年)[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2017, 25(12): 889-894. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXPW201712001.htm
[6] 付郁, 单国顺, 尹爱凝, 等. 中西医治疗功能性消化不良研究进展[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2021, 39(10): 82-85, 270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYHS202110018.htm
[7] 邹多武. 中国功能性消化不良专家共识意见(2015年, 上海)解读: 定义和流行病学[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2016, 36(4): 231-232. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2016.04.003
[8] 中华中医药学会脾胃病分会, 张声生. 功能性消化不良中医诊疗专家共识意见(2017)[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2017, 32(6): 2595-2598. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY201706072.htm
[9] 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则[S]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 134-139.
[10] Enck P, Azpiroz F, Boeckxstaens G, et al. Functional dyspepsia[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017, 3: 17081. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.81
[11] 王龙华, 王凤磊, 李静, 等. 功能性消化不良的中医辨治思路与对策[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2021, 36(9): 5368-5371. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY202109066.htm
[12] 张声生, 钦丹萍, 周强, 等. 消化系统常见病功能性消化不良中医诊疗指南: 基层医生版[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2019, 34(8): 3619-3625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY201908075.htm
[13] 李莉, 贾庆玲, 王煜姣, 等. 柴胡疏肝散对功能性消化不良大鼠胃组织线粒体功能及线粒体自噬的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2021, 27(23): 26-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSFX202123004.htm
[14] 沈加福, 谭淑芬. 黄芪建中汤合枳实消痞丸加减治疗脾胃虚弱型功能性消化不良的效果[J]. 中外医学研究, 2022, 20(1): 67-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJZY202201019.htm
[15] 李岩, 白光. 温病祛湿三法在慢性胃病治疗中的应用[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2021, 29(10): 741-744. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2021.10.13
[16] 张修红, 陈金雄, 傅开龙, 等. 足三里及合谷穴位注射维生素B1治疗功能性消化不良的临床观察[J]. 针刺研究, 2021, 46(12): 1043-1047. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYJ202112009.htm
[17] 涂蓓蕾, 时昭红, 付丽鹤, 等. 针刺配合穴位贴敷治疗功能性消化不良伴睡眠障碍的临床研究[J]. 针灸临床杂志, 2018, 34(3): 32-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2018.03.009
[18] 侯理伟, 荣培晶, 李亮, 等. 经皮耳穴迷走神经刺激对功能性消化不良大鼠自主神经功能的影响[J]. 针刺研究, 2021, 46(8): 663-670. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XCYJ202108006.htm
[19] Tang L, Zeng Y, Li L, et al. Electroacupuncture Upregulated Ghrelin in Rats with Functional Dyspepsia via AMPK/TSC2/Rheb-Mediated mTOR Inhibition[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2020, 65(6): 1689-1699. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05960-5
[20] 戴一青, 王金金, 张磊, 等. 心理治疗对老年功能性消化不良患者消化功能及心理状态的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(10): 1710-1712, 1716. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202110025.htm
[21] 《中成药治疗优势病种临床应用指南》标准化项目组. 中成药治疗功能性消化不良临床应用指南(2021年)[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2022, 42(1): 5-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXJ202201001.htm
[22] 刘惠武, 严红梅, 许丹, 等. 消胀颗粒对功能性消化不良大鼠胃排空及胃肠激素的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2021, 29(4): 231-233, 239. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2021.04.01
[23] 梁君蓉, 周永强, 胡康, 等. 胃苏颗粒联合多潘立酮治疗肝胃不和型功能性消化不良及对胃肠激素影响的临床研究[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2021, 29(4): 272-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-038X.2021.04.09
[24] 胡晨霞, 凤良元, 鄢顺琴. 四逆散的药理与临床研究进展[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志, 2001, (S1): 18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYY2001S1017.htm
[25] 杨思雨, 詹梁, 袁满, 等. 经典名方温胆汤的研究进展[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2021, 23(7): 2361-2371. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJKX202107026.htm