Effect of therapeutic support intervention on patients undergoing endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection
-
摘要: [目的]探究治疗性支持干预应用于内镜下胃黏膜剥离术患者的效果。[方法]选取我院2015年1月~2016年10月收治的采用常规干预的内镜下胃黏膜剥离术患者61例作为对照组,另选取我院2016年11月~2018年8月收治的采用治疗性支持干预的内镜下胃黏膜剥离术患者61例作为观察组。对比2组术后疼痛程度变化及治疗依从性、并发症发生率及恢复情况。[结果]观察组术后第1 ~3 天疼痛程度均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组治疗依从性高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组胃肠减压时间、腹胀缓解时间、住院时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。[结论]治疗性支持干预应用于内镜下胃黏膜剥离术患者可有效减轻其疼痛程度,提高治疗依从性,并促进恢复,值得临床推广。Abstract: [Objective] To investigate the effect of therapeutic support intervention in patients undergoing endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection.[Methods]Sixty-one cases of gastric mucosal dissection treated with conventional intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to October 2016 were selected as control group,and 61 cases of gastric mucosal dissection treated with therapeutic support intervention from November 2016 to August 2018 were selected as observation group.The postoperative pain degree and treatment compliance,incidence of complications and recovery were compared between the two groups.[Results]The pain degree of the observation group was lower than that of the control group at 1 d,2 d and 3 d after operation(P＜0.05).The treatment compliance of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The gastrointestinal decompression time,the time of bloating remission,and the hospitalization time in the observation group were all shorter than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).[Conclusion]Therapeutic support intervention in patients with endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection can effectively alleviate the degree of pain,improve treatment compliance,and promote recovery,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
-
-
[1] 杨宏昌, 付成锋, 彭铁立.内镜黏膜下剥离术后胃人工溃疡的药物治疗进展[J].中国实用医刊, 2018, 45 (16):125-128.
[2] 戎龙, 蔡云龙, 年卫东, 等.国内单中心早期胃癌外科切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21 (2):190-195.
[3] Ohara Y, Takimoto K, Toyonaga T, et al.Enormous postoperative perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal cancer successfully treated with filling and shielding by polyglycolic acid sheets with fibrin glue and computed tomography-guided abscess puncture[J].Clin J Gastroenterol, 2017, 10 (6):524-529.
[4] 袁媛, 周炳喜, 李亚其, 等.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管和胃早癌及癌前病变的价值以及术后病理差异分析 (附337例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24 (8):108-112.
[5] 吴晓宝, 占志高.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠巨大宽蒂/广基息肉35例临床观察[J].中外医学研究, 2018, 16 (19):157-159.
[6] 唐涛, 张海兵, 李伟平.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合放疗治疗11例侵犯黏膜下层早期食管癌[J].肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 24 (5):513-515.
[7] Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Kobayashi S, et al.Oral epithelial cell sheets engraftment for esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection of squamous cell carcinoma and airplane transportation[J].Sci Rep, 2017, 7 (1):17460.
[8] 梁光春, 何朝辉, 张浩鑫, 等.内镜下套扎术联合内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃肠道间质瘤的效果观察[J].中国实用医刊, 2018, 45 (5):30-32.
[9] 徐康, 金海林, 丁玺, 等.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期结直肠癌的应用价值与安全性评估[J].中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24 (5):17-22.
[10] 於亮亮, 吴加国, 刘启芳, 等.胃黏膜低级别上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后病理出现升级的危险因素[J].中华消化杂志, 2017, 37 (9):598-601.
[11] Kabashima A, Kimura K, Sanefuji K, et al.Completely Responsive Multiple Liver Recurrence of Colon Cancer Treated Using Chemotherapy with Oral S-1and Oxaliplatin Plus Bevacizumab:A Case Report[J].Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi, 2017, 108 (1):8-13.
[12] 梁丽, 于妍斐, 张继新, 等.113例早期结直肠癌及癌前病变内镜黏膜下剥离术标本处理及病理学评估[J].中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35 (7):470-476.
[13] 杨敏, 张敏, 周勤.内镜黏膜下剥离术中穿孔患者应用二氧化碳注气的护理[J].护理学杂志, 2015, 30 (5):32-34.
[14] Yamaguchi D, Yamaguchi N, Takeuchi Y, et al.Comparison of sedation between the endoscopy room and operation room during endoscopic submucosal dissection for neoplasms in the upper gastrointestinal tract[J].BMC Gastroenterol, 2017, 17 (1):127.
[15] 何小建, 李达周, 刘建强, 等.局部注射曲安奈德与口服甲泼尼龙预防食管早期癌内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的疗效观察[J].中华消化杂志, 2017, 37 (4):227-231.
[16] 刘东碧, 杨雁, 于双.内镜黏膜剥离术对早期胃癌患者血清胃蛋白酶原水平及预后的影响[J].国际消化病杂志, 2018, 38 (3):213-216.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 201
- PDF下载数: 182
- 施引文献: 0
下载: